School policy · checked October 19, 2026
Detector: restricted
The university does not endorse AI-detection software, holds no central contract for it, and bars buying it on purchase cards because of risks to students' copyright, intellectual property, and FERPA privacy.
“The University does not endorse the use of AI Detection Software and does not have any central contracts or purchase orders with active AI Detection Software features”
Status source: the school’s own published page — read it · checked October 19, 2026.
Published window: 14 calendar days to appeal a finding.
“by submitting a written appeal to the president within fourteen days from the date the appealing party was notified of the disciplinary decision”
Window source: the school’s own published page — read it · checked October 19, 2026.
The rule says 'fourteen days' without specifying business or calendar — counted here as calendar days. Your letter governs.
Count it from your notice date in the free checker. If your letter states a different date, the letter wins.
A hearing officer or a panel of the Student Conduct Board hears the case; appeals go to the President.
University of Texas at Austin restricts or discourages detectors in its own guidance. Ask, in writing, whether the use in your case followed the school's own limits — then answer with your trail, which is the evidence that outlasts the argument about the tool.
Next steps: count your deadline in the free checker, build from the evidence list, and compare schools in the full table.
Get the MyWorkMyWords Kit — $39
One payment of $39. No subscription. The kit is a web page you can return to and print — the evidence binder builder, appeal statement templates, hearing scripts, and deadline tracker, built for a student answering an accusation this week.