School policy · checked October 19, 2026
Detector stance: not published
No published institution-wide stance on AI detectors was located in the school's public pages in this check. Recorded honestly as not documented; its Honor process below is verified.
No published source found in our check of the school’s public pages, October 19, 2026 — recorded as not documented, not guessed.
Published window: 30 calendar days to appeal a finding.
“Within thirty (30) calendar days following the hearing with the Panel for Sanction, a guilty student may file a single appeal for good cause”
Window source: the school’s own published page — read it · checked October 19, 2026.
A separate route allows new-evidence appeals within two years of the sanction hearing.
Count it from your notice date in the free checker. If your letter states a different date, the letter wins.
The student-run Honor Committee hears cases in two stages: a Panel for Guilt and a Panel for Sanction.
We found no published detector stance for University of Virginia, so your case runs on its integrity process and the general rule of these cases: the student with the checkable trail makes the strongest answer. Build the binder first; argue about the tool second.
Next steps: count your deadline in the free checker, build from the evidence list, and compare schools in the full table.
Get the MyWorkMyWords Kit — $39
One payment of $39. No subscription. The kit is a web page you can return to and print — the evidence binder builder, appeal statement templates, hearing scripts, and deadline tracker, built for a student answering an accusation this week.