School policy · checked October 19, 2026
Detector: OFF
The Teaching Center tested Turnitin's detector, decided not to endorse or support any AI detector, and the feature is disabled — citing false positives, inequity, and legal risk.
“We recommend against using AI detection tools, which are not accurate enough to prove that students' have violated academic integrity policies”
Status source: the school’s own published page — read it · checked October 19, 2026.
Published window: 5 business days to appeal a finding.
“within five (5) working days of the date of the decision letter”
Window source: the school’s own published page — read it · checked October 19, 2026.
Count it from your notice date in the free checker. If your letter states a different date, the letter wins.
The Academic Integrity Hearing Board — three faculty and three students — hears the case; review can be sought from the Provost or the University Review Board.
If a detector score is being used against you at University of Pittsburgh, the school's own decision is your first exhibit: the institution turned this tool off because it did not trust it. Ask, in writing, which tool produced your score and under what authority it was used anyway — then answer with your trail.
Next steps: count your deadline in the free checker, build from the evidence list, and compare schools in the full table.
Get the MyWorkMyWords Kit — $39
One payment of $39. No subscription. The kit is a web page you can return to and print — the evidence binder builder, appeal statement templates, hearing scripts, and deadline tracker, built for a student answering an accusation this week.