School policy · checked October 19, 2026
Detector: restricted
The university does not currently endorse AI-detection tools for assignments because they create false positives and may be ineffective, per its AI Council guidance.
“UO does not currently endorse AI-detection tools for assignments because those tools create false positives and may be ineffective”
Status source: reporting or registry listing — read it · being double-checked against the school’s own pages · checked October 19, 2026.
Published window: 14 calendar days to appeal a finding.
“Appeals are due in writing within 14 calendar days of receiving your decision letter”
Window source: the school’s own published page — read it · checked October 19, 2026.
Count it from your notice date in the free checker. If your letter states a different date, the letter wins.
An administrative conference with the Director or a case manager, or a hearing before a hearings panel; appeals are written-only to the University Appellate Body.
University of Oregon restricts or discourages detectors in its own guidance. Ask, in writing, whether the use in your case followed the school's own limits — then answer with your trail, which is the evidence that outlasts the argument about the tool.
Next steps: count your deadline in the free checker, build from the evidence list, and compare schools in the full table.
Get the MyWorkMyWords Kit — $39
One payment of $39. No subscription. The kit is a web page you can return to and print — the evidence binder builder, appeal statement templates, hearing scripts, and deadline tracker, built for a student answering an accusation this week.