School policy · checked October 19, 2026
Detector stance: not published
No published institution-wide stance on AI detectors was located in the school's public pages in this check. Recorded honestly as not documented; its Honor Court process below is verified.
No published source found in our check of the school’s public pages, October 19, 2026 — recorded as not documented, not guessed.
Published window: 5 business days to appeal a finding.
“may file a petition for appeal no later than five business days (weekends and University holidays excepted) from delivery to the accused student of the written summary of the hearing panel's judgment and sanctions”
Window source: the school’s own published page — read it · checked October 19, 2026.
Count it from your notice date in the free checker. If your letter states a different date, the letter wins.
The student-run Honor Court hears cases; appeals are reviewed by the Judicial Programs Officer, an Appellate Review Board, or a University Hearings Board appellate panel.
We found no published detector stance for University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, so your case runs on its integrity process and the general rule of these cases: the student with the checkable trail makes the strongest answer. Build the binder first; argue about the tool second.
Next steps: count your deadline in the free checker, build from the evidence list, and compare schools in the full table.
Get the MyWorkMyWords Kit — $39
One payment of $39. No subscription. The kit is a web page you can return to and print — the evidence binder builder, appeal statement templates, hearing scripts, and deadline tracker, built for a student answering an accusation this week.