School policy · checked October 19, 2026
Detector stance: not published
No documented institutional AI-detector stance for the Boston campus was found in this check — beware a common mix-up: the widely quoted sole-evidence rule belongs to National University, a different school. Recorded honestly as not documented; the appeal window below is verified.
No published source found in our check of the school’s public pages, October 19, 2026 — recorded as not documented, not guessed.
Published window: 7 calendar days to appeal a finding.
“The student should appeal within one week of the imposition of penalties”
Window source: the school’s own published page — read it · checked October 19, 2026.
From the graduate engineering academic-integrity policy ('within one week' — counted as 7 calendar days). Other colleges may set their own route.
Count it from your notice date in the free checker. If your letter states a different date, the letter wins.
A faculty meeting first, then department review, then the college academic appeal process; conduct cases go to an OSCCR hearing board.
We found no published detector stance for Northeastern University, so your case runs on its integrity process and the general rule of these cases: the student with the checkable trail makes the strongest answer. Build the binder first; argue about the tool second.
Next steps: count your deadline in the free checker, build from the evidence list, and compare schools in the full table.
Get the MyWorkMyWords Kit — $39
One payment of $39. No subscription. The kit is a web page you can return to and print — the evidence binder builder, appeal statement templates, hearing scripts, and deadline tracker, built for a student answering an accusation this week.