School policy · checked October 19, 2026
Detector: restricted
School guidance to faculty states plainly that there is currently no reliable AI detector, and that red flags in writing are not proof of misconduct.
“None of these are proof of misconduct. There is currently no reliable AI detector”
Status source: the school’s own published page — read it · checked October 19, 2026.
Published window: 10 business days to appeal a finding.
“The student must file their appeal no later than 10 business days after the date the notification was sent”
Window source: the school’s own published page — read it · checked October 19, 2026.
Count it from your notice date in the free checker. If your letter states a different date, the letter wins.
A college or school hearing board — at least two faculty members and one student — recommends to the Dean, who decides.
Arizona State University restricts or discourages detectors in its own guidance. Ask, in writing, whether the use in your case followed the school's own limits — then answer with your trail, which is the evidence that outlasts the argument about the tool.
Next steps: count your deadline in the free checker, build from the evidence list, and compare schools in the full table.
Get the MyWorkMyWords Kit — $39
One payment of $39. No subscription. The kit is a web page you can return to and print — the evidence binder builder, appeal statement templates, hearing scripts, and deadline tracker, built for a student answering an accusation this week.